Freedom Updates
Advocates in Action
PRESS RELEASE | JOINT BRIEF ASKS SUPREME COURT TO HALT SCHOOL SECRECY ON CHILDREN’S GENDER TRANSITIONS
ADVOCATES FOR FAITH & FREEDOM
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 1, 2025
CONTACT: NICOLE VELASCO
MEDIA@FAITH-FREEDOM.COM
Washington, D.C.— Advocates for Faith & Freedom, in partnership with NC Values Institute, has filed an amicus curiae brief urging the United States Supreme Court to take up Littlejohn v. School Board of Leon County, Florida. At issue is the Leon County School Board’s “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Gender Nonconforming and Questioning Support Guide,” which directs school staff to use a child’s chosen name and pronouns without parental knowledge or consent—and, in some cases, to conceal such information from parents.
The brief argues that this policy intrudes on parents’ right to direct the upbringing of their children, compels speech on a deeply contested issue, and imposes an unconstitutional orthodoxy in public schools. The Eleventh Circuit’s use of a vague “shocks-the-conscience” test effectively stripped parents of their ability to defend their rights, a dangerous precedent that endangers free speech, religious liberty, and the foundational role of the family.
“Parents do not surrender their God-given and constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door,” said Robert Tyler, President and Chief Counsel of Advocates for Faith & Freedom. “Schools cannot secretly facilitate a child’s gender transition while deceiving parents. The Constitution safeguards the right of mothers and fathers, not government bureaucrats, to guide their children’s upbringing.”
The brief underscores that compelled speech in schools—such as forcing students, teachers, and parents to use pronouns or affirm gender ideology against their beliefs—violates the First Amendment’s protection of conscience and free expression. As the filing warns, policies that mandate ideological conformity not only trample religious liberty but also attack the very dignity of those who disagree.
Julianne Fleischer, Senior Legal Counsel of Advocates for Faith and Freedom, added: “This case is about restoring common sense and reaffirming parental authority. No government entity has the right to replace parents or compel citizens to embrace a state-imposed ideology. The Court must act to defend the rights of parents and the freedoms of all Americans.”
Advocates for Faith & Freedom and NC Values Institute are standing together to ensure that the Supreme Court recognizes the urgency of protecting parental rights, free speech, and religious freedom against the rising tide of government overreach in education.
Full brief can be viewed here.
###
Advocates for Faith & Freedom is a non-profit law firm dedicated to protecting constitutional and religious liberty in the courts. Our mission is to engage in cases that will uphold our religious liberty and America’s heritage and to educate Americans about our fundamental constitutional rights.
PRESS RELEASE | DEFENDING CONSCIENCE: ADVOCATES FOR FAITH & FREEDOM PETITION SUPREME COURT IN CALIFORNIA BAKER’S CASE
ADVOCATES FOR FAITH & FREEDOM
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2025
CONTACT: NICOLE VELASCO
MEDIA@FAITH-FREEDOM.COM
Murrieta, CA — Advocates for Faith & Freedom has filed an amicus brief before the United States Supreme Court in support of Catharine Miller, owner of Cathy’s Creations, a Christian baker who is being punished by the State of California for living out her faith. The case asks the Court to correct a dangerous ruling that tramples both the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious liberty and the freedom of speech.
At stake is whether the government can force Christians to create messages that violate their biblical convictions. California courts have ruled that Miller’s custom wedding cakes are “just desserts” with no expressive meaning, ignoring clear precedent in Masterpiece Cakeshop and 303 Creative, where the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed that custom wedding services are inherently expressive and protected from government-compelled speech.
“This case is about far more than cakes, it’s about whether the government can coerce believers to bow to the ideology of the day,” said Erin Mersino, Vice President and Chief of Supreme Court and Appellate Litigation at Advocates for Faith & Freedom. “The First Amendment guarantees that no American should be compelled to speak a message they reject. If the state can force a Christian baker to celebrate same-sex marriage, it can just as easily force any one of us to endorse views that violate our conscience and our faith.”
The amicus brief warns that the California decision deepens a national divide on how religious freedom and free speech are treated under state public accommodation laws. If left unchecked, the ruling gives states license to silence Christians in the marketplace by punishing them for their beliefs.
“Faithful Christians should never be put in the position of choosing between their livelihood and their obedience to God,” said Robert Tyler, President of Advocates for Faith & Freedom. “We urge the Supreme Court to step in, protect free expression, and reaffirm that no one should be compelled by government to celebrate what their faith compels them to reject.”
Advocates for Faith & Freedom will continue to fight for religious liberty in the courts, ensuring that biblical truth is not erased by state power.
Full brief can be viewed here.
###
Advocates for Faith & Freedom is a non-profit law firm dedicated to protecting constitutional and religious liberty in the courts. Our mission is to engage in cases that will uphold our religious liberty and America’s heritage and to educate Americans about our fundamental constitutional rights.
PRESS RELEASE | VICTORY FOR FAIRNESS: FEDERAL COURT ALLOWS KEY TITLE IX AND FREE SPEECH CLAIMS TO ADVANCE IN LANDMARK CASE AGAINST RIVERSIDE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
ADVOCATES FOR FAITH & FREEDOM
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2025
CONTACT: NICOLE VELASCO
MEDIA@FAITH-FREEDOM.COM
Murrieta, CA — In a significant win for female athletes and student rights, the United States District Court for the Central District of California has ruled in favor of plaintiffs T.S., K.S., and Save Girls’ Sports, allowing their core Title IX discrimination claim to proceed against the Riverside Unified School District. The court’s order, issued on September 24, 2025, also confirms that the plaintiffs’ First Amendment free speech claims have survived dismissal, marking a crucial step forward in the fight for equal opportunities and free expression in schools. Additionally, the court granted leave to amend other claims, providing a clear path to strengthen the case and seek full justice.
The plaintiffs filed suit alleging that the District’s actions, including the favorable treatment of a male athlete on the girls’ cross-country team, violated Title IX by discriminating against female athletes. In denying the School Defendants’ motion to dismiss the intentional discrimination claim under Title IX (Claim Four), the court recognized the plaintiffs’ allegations of unequal treatment, such as relaxed attendance policies and individualized coaching provided to the male athlete but not to the female athletes.
“This ruling is a resounding victory for fairness in women’s sports and the protection of free speech,” said Julianne Fleischer, Senior Counsel for Advocates for Faith & Freedom and attorney for the plaintiffs. “The court’s decision to let our key Title IX claim proceed sends a strong message that schools cannot treat the rights of our female athletes as second-class.”
The court also upheld the plaintiffs’ standing to pursue monetary damages, emphasizing in Footnote 7 that the mere operation of California’s AB 1266—allowing transgender athletes to participate in sports consistent with their gender identity—constitutes a cognizable injury under Title IX. This recognition underscores the court’s acknowledgment that even baseline participation policies can harm female athletes’ opportunities, bolstering the plaintiffs’ position as they advance.
“We are one step closer to restoring fairness and safety in girls’ sports,” added Fleischer. “We look forward to holding officials accountable and giving voice to the girls who have been silenced.”
The plaintiffs plan to file an amended complaint by October 15, 2025, addressing the court’s guidance. This case continues to draw national attention, highlighting ongoing debates about equity, free speech, and inclusion in school sports.
###
Advocates for Faith & Freedom is a non-profit law firm dedicated to protecting constitutional and religious liberty in the courts. Our mission is to engage in cases that will uphold our religious liberty and America’s heritage and to educate Americans about our fundamental constitutional rights.