Freedom Updates
Advocates in Action
Press Release | Advocates for Faith & Freedom Files U.S. Supreme Court Amicus Brief Defending Parental Rights
ADVOCATES FOR FAITH & FREEDOM
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Thursday, August 21, 2025
CONTACT: Lori Sanada
media@FAITH-FREEDOM.COM
Murrieta, CA — Advocates for Faith & Freedom, in partnership with NC Values Institute, filed an amicus brief this week in the United States Supreme Court in support of the petitioners in Foote v. Ludlow School Committee, urging the Court to reverse a decision by the First Circuit Court of Appeals that undermines fundamental parental rights.
The case involves Massachusetts parents whose two children were secretly socially transitioned by school officials without their knowledge or consent. The parents were not only excluded from the decision but were actively misled by the school. The amicus brief argues that such actions amount to an unconstitutional and de facto termination of parental rights.
“This case represents one of the most egregious violations of parental rights we’ve seen to date,” said Robert Tyler, President and Chief Counsel of Advocates for Faith & Freedom. “When schools deliberately withhold life-altering information about a child from parents, it doesn’t just violate trust — it violates the Constitution.”
The joint brief emphasizes that parental rights are among the oldest and most deeply rooted liberty interests protected by the U.S. Constitution. Citing long-standing Supreme Court precedent, the amici argue that parents, not schools, possess the primary authority to make medical, educational, and moral decisions for their children — including those involving gender identity.
Julianne Fleischer, Senior Legal Counsel at Advocates for Faith & Freedom, added, “The right of parents to raise their children according to their values — including religious and moral beliefs — is not negotiable. Public schools cannot operate as secret-keepers against families.”
The brief also highlights the dangerous precedent set by the Ludlow School Committee’s “Protocol,” which directs school personnel to affirm a child’s request to socially transition — including name and pronoun changes — while keeping parents in the dark. The amici argue that such a policy compels speech, undermines religious liberty, and fails to meet even the most basic constitutional standards, including the requirement of strict scrutiny when fundamental rights are at stake.
You can read the full amicus brief here.
###
Advocates for Faith & Freedom is a non-profit law firm dedicated to protecting constitutional and religious liberty in the courts. Our mission is to engage in cases that will uphold our religious liberty and America’s heritage and to educate Americans about our fundamental constitutional rights.
Advocates for Faith & Freedom Challenges California’s Ban on Religious Vaccine Exemptions in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
ADVOCATES FOR FAITH & FREEDOM
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Wednesday, April 16, 2025
CONTACT: Nicole Velasco
NVELASCO@FAITH-FREEDOM.COM
Murrieta, CA—On Friday, August 8, 2025, Advocates for Faith and Freedom filed its opening brief with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on behalf of four California moms and their families fighting to restore religious exemptions to the state’s vaccination law. Since 1961, California had allowed exemptions for personal beliefs—including religious objections. But in 2016, the State nixed all personal belief exemptions, which they knew to also include any and all religious exemptions. The State’s vaccine law, SB 277, still allows exemptions for secular reasons though. The State allows students with a medical exemption, students who are over 18-years-old, students with IEPs (individualized education plans), students with certain social statuses like homelessness, military families, and in foster care, and students transferring schools to be exempt or to enjoy periods of exemption from the law’s requirements. Yet even though the State allows numerous secular exemptions, it refused to allow a religious exemption to the small number of families who seek to exempt their children based on religious reasons. Religious families who object to the vaccines required under SB 277 have to choose: follow their sincerely held religious beliefs or forego admissibility to all private and public schools for their children in the State of California.
“Advocates for Faith & Freedom’s brief highlights what is an important point of fairness but also an important principle of constitutional law: before the State is allowed to ban schoolchildren from all public and private schools in California, it must demonstrate that doing so is necessary. It is hard to prove necessity to single out religious exemptions for extinction, however, when the State allows so many secular exemptions which seemingly pose the same harm.” said Erin Mersino, Vice President of Advocates for Faith and Freedom.
“Our First Amendment liberties must be protected with vigilance,” added Robert Tyler, President and Chief Counsel of Advocates for Faith & Freedom. “We are honored to take this fight to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on behalf of our courageous clients.”
###
PRESS RELEASE | CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CHALLENGES UNJUST INJUCTION ON SCHOOL BOARD INVOCATIONS
Press Release
ADVOCATES FOR FAITH & FREEDOM
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: tHURSDAY, JULY 31, 2025
CONTACT: Nicole Velasco at
media@faith-freedom.COM
CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CHALLENGES UNJUST INJUCTION ON SCHOOL BOARD INVOCATIONS
Murrieta, CA — Today, Chino Valley Unified School District (CVUSD) has taken decisive legal action to challenge an outdated injunction that prohibits school board meetings from opening with an invocation. The injunction, originally imposed by the Ninth Circuit Court, was based on the now-defunct Lemon test, which the U.S. Supreme Court recently struck down as an unreliable and ahistorical framework for interpreting the Establishment Clause.
In its place, the Supreme Court has clarified that constitutional questions regarding religious expression should be analyzed in light of our nation’s history and traditions. The Founding Fathers recognized the power of invocations to solemnize proceedings and unify communities, demonstrating that such practices are deeply rooted in American governance.
Because the invalid Lemon test was used to justify the injunction against CVUSD’s policy of opening board meetings with prayer, this restriction is no longer legally sound or equitable. Advocates for Faith & Freedom, on behalf of CVUSD, has therefore filed a motion to lift the injunction, seeking to establish a policy that permits invocations prior to school board meetings in accordance with long-standing American traditions.
“Our school board welcomed voices of all faiths without coercion or preference, yet groups driven by political agendas forced us to abandon a unifying tradition,” said CVUSD School Board President, Sonja Shaw. “This is not what the First Amendment was meant to protect. We will not quietly surrender our right to reflect the values of our community and the freedoms our nation was built upon.”
“This injunction was based on a now-overturned legal doctrine and suppresses a practice that has been part of our nation’s fabric since its inception,” said Advocates attorney, Robert Tyler. “The Supreme Court has made it clear that the history and traditions of our country should guide our understanding of the Establishment Clause. Chino Valley Unified School District is right to challenge this injunction and restore the rightful place of invocations in its school board meetings.”
This legal challenge underscores a broader effort to reaffirm constitutional freedoms and honor America’s historical commitment to religious expression in public life. Advocates for Faith & Freedom stands firm in its commitment to protecting religious expression in the public sphere and ensuring that communities are free to exercise their constitutional rights.