Student's Free Speech - DENIED

Caylin, an 8th grade student at a Corona-Norco public school, was reprimanded and threatened with consequences after passing out a flier to schoolmates before school began warning her fellow students of the new “co-ed bathroom and locker room bill.” This controversy arises as referendum petitions are being Little_Girl_in_front_of_school (1)

circulated for signatures in order to repeal AB 1266, a new California law that allows public school students to use opposite-sex restrooms and locker rooms, and also allows students to play on opposite-sex athletic teams.

On the morning of October 21, 2013, Caylin was standing outside in the lunch area at 7:00 a.m. (before school started) distributing a flier warning students of this newly adopted law that affects students’ privacy rights. Since school had not yet started, students were talking with friends and waiting for the school bell to ring. As Caylin was handing out eighteen fliers to friends and school acquaintances, a school security officer came over and asked if she was responsible for distributing the fliers. Caylin informed the officer that she was and he told her to report to the principal’s office.

Once in the principal’s office, Principal Dade told her she could not hand out political fliers because it was against the law. Principal Dade asked Caylin who told her to distribute the fliers. Caylin informed Principal Dade that she decided to do it on her own after learning about the new law from church. Principal Dade replied that Caylin’s church “should be ashamed for making her do this [distribute fliers].” Caylin informed Principal Dade that no one told her to do it. Principal Dade threatened Caylin that she would face consequences if any parents called to complain.

Advocates for Faith & Freedom intervened on behalf of Caylin, sending a letter to the school’s Principal and Superintendent detailing the reasons their policy is unconstitutional. We requested that Caylin be allowed to distribute her fliers and that the school respond, or we would be forced to take legal action.

Long ago, the United States Supreme Court ruled that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.” We at Advocates take this idea of students’ rights very seriously.

Our General Counsel, Robert Tyler, stated, “Censorship of a student based on a ‘24 hour’ notice requirement is unconstitutional.” He further stated, “Students have the right to express their opinions on controversial subjects, and even warn other students of new laws that threaten their personal privacy.”

In the afternoon on October 29, 2013, the school district relented in writing and agreed to allow Caylin to resume her distribution of fliers that warn of the “co-ed bathroom and locker room bill.” Caylin plans to continue passing out the fliers each day at school.

Christy, the mother of Caylin said, “All parents of public school students should be outraged at this bill. I was very surprised when the school wanted to silence my daughter rather than let her be a voice for herself and all students whose privacy is being threatened by this bill.”

Please keep us in your prayers as we continue to defend the freedom of students like Caylin, who wish to express themselves, their faith, and their ideas at the place where they spend a good majority of their time at this age…their schools.

Referendum Against "The Bathroom Bill"

Bathroom sign symbolsIn August of this year, Governor Jerry Brown signed Assembly Bill 1266 into law in California. This law allows public school students to choose whichever athletic team they want to be on - male or female. Further, it also allows public school students to choose the restrooms and locker rooms of their choice - male or female. Advocates’ attorneys have been warning you of this “gender liberation” movement for years. We are now faced with this law and we plan to do something about it! Advocates for Faith & Freedom, along with other organizations, are involved in the referendum to overturn the co-ed bathroom law for the sake of our children and grandchildren.

How California Residents Can Help 

  • Advocates’ Murrieta office is a Petition DistributionCenter where you can pick-up petitions or you may download the petitions from the website: www.privacyforallstudents.com.  We are located at 24910 Las Brisas Road, Ste. 110, Murrieta, CA 92562. Signed petitions can be delivered to our office by November 1st or you can mail them directly to: Privacy for All Students, 660 J Street, Ste. 250, Sacramento, CA 95814 by November 6th.  If you are a registered voter, get a petition and gather signatures from as many concerned citizens, family, and friends as you can.  (Very Important to Note:  Be sure that everyone who signs the petition - up to 8 signatures – are all signing the petition from the same county they are registered in and no post office boxes, otherwise the entire petition will be invalid.)

  • Ask your pastor, priest or rabbi if they would be willing to set up tables and      encourage their congregation to sign the petitions. We need 505,000 signatures by the first week of November.  

How Non-Californian Residents Can Help 

  • Please pray that we can get enough signatures so that this senseless law will be overturned. Currently this is happening in California, but it’s just a matter of  time that this type of law may affect your state as well.

Now is the time for all people of California to get involved to stop this ridiculous legislation. We are reminded of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. who wrote:

      “The church must be reminded that it is not the master or the servant of the state, but rather the conscience of the state.  It must be the guide and the critic of the state, and never its tool. If the church does not recapture its prophetic zeal, it will become an irrelevant social club without moral or spiritual authority.” Strength to Love, 1963.

 

Will the Mt. Soledad Cross Remain?

Recently, we sent an amicus brief to the district court in opposition to the decision of the Ninth Circuit regarding the Mt. Soledad cross in San Diego, CA. Mt Soledad Cross In 2011, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the cross was unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause in our Constitution. The decision stated, "Overall, a reasonable observer viewing the Memorial would be confronted with an initial dedication for religious purposes…” However, the Court did not decide what to do with the memorial.

This decision was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, but they declined to hear the case. So, the Ninth Circuit verdict remains in place.

          We believe that this cross is a longstanding memorial to our men and women in uniform, and we – along with other supporters – suggest that the land the cross sits on be sold to a private party so that the memorial can remain. With the sale or transfer of the land to a private organization, the government would be free from any perceived endorsement of religion.

This would be a far better resolution than removing the cross altogether. The Mt. Soledad Cross has stood atop a hill in La Jolla, CA, since 1913 (the current cross was erected in 1954) and is a memorial honoring veterans who have served our country.

ACTION POINT

          Please pray with us as our amicus brief goes before the District Court. We pray that this memorial will continue to stand in honor of those who have bravely served our country!

Mass Attacks on Christians and Churches in Egypt

Last week, mass attacks on Christians and churches began occurring across Egypt. The Muslim Brotherhood had accused Christians of being a cause in the ousting of Egypt’s president, Mohamed Morsi, and staged sit ins across Cairo in protest.  When these sit ins ended in violence, the Muslim Brotherhood called for revenge on Christians and began torching and looting churches, monasteries, schools – even orphanages – until the violence spread across the country.

At least 40 churches were targeted in the attacks, which left at least 4 people dead.  In Egypt, Christians make up about 10% of the population, and it’s believed that the violence between religious factions had increased since Morsi came to power.  Even since he was deposed, the government has not given strong support or protection to Christian churches.

Please Pray          We ask that you stand with us in prayer for this nation and the persecuted Christians who are holding onto their faith.  These attacksagainst Christians and religious institutions have not been widely reported here in America – we ask that you share this with others and widen the network of support and prayer.

It is in times and situations like these that we learn to appreciate even more the freedoms we have in America – to worship as we choose and to share the Gospel with others.  May God bless those without such freedoms in Egypt and around the world, who are currently facing persecution and terror in their own homes.

Not Guilty – Christians Acquitted After Bible Reading at DMV

**UPDATE with more information** This month, we took one of our most talked-about cases to trial.  Over two years ago, three men were arrested for reading from the Bible outside of the DMV in Hemet, CA. The officer told them that they weren’t allowed to “preach to a captive audience.” After placing the men in custody, the arresting officers learned that there is no such law, so the officers had to come up with something else–interfering with an open business through obstruction or intimidation. However, the DMV was actually closed at the time our clients were evangelizing and they were standing at least 40 feet away from the business so that citation did not stick.

After political pressure was launched upon the Riverside County D.A. by the CHP, new charges were drummed-up and two of the men–Brett Coronado and Mark Mackey–were prosecuted for failing to have a permit to conduct a “demonstration or gathering.” We defended Brett and Mark by arguing that merely reading the Bible out loud, in front of a group of people waiting in line, can hardly amount to an illegal demonstration or gathering. You can view the video footage of the arrest on our website at www.faith-freedom.com.

The trial occurred over five days in August, 2013. For some reason, this case was so important to the District Attorney that he appointed a felony prosecutor to this misdemeanor case. The prosecution called eight witnesses to trial; but upon cross examination, we were able to elicit testimony from most of the witnesses undermining the prosecution’s case!

On Tuesday, August 13, our defense team made a motion for directed verdict at the conclusion of the prosecution's case in chief and before we began presenting any defense witnesses. The trial judge granted our motion and found our clients “not guilty!” The judge also commented that he agreed that the law being applied was unconstitutional. By the grace of God, our clients were victorious in this trial!

Some Christians have commented that they disapprove of Brett and Mark's method of evangelism because their approach might be offensive to some people. Certainly, Christians have differing viewpoints on the subject of evangelism. But we want to explain why this case is relevant to all Christians who have a desire to share the Good News of Jesus Christ.

Why this case affects every Christian

God has blessed us to live in a nation where we have the freedom to share our faith from the pulpit, through our lives, or even on the streets. Perhaps you would not choose the same means of sharing your faith, but if our clients were arrested and charged for reading the Bible out loud on State property, who’s to say that you won’t be prohibited from conducting a small Bible study in the park or singing Christian songs around a fire pit at the public beach?

            We knew that this case had to be fought. These men were simply reading from the Bible in public and the CHP and District Attorney were relentless in trying to prosecute our clients.

         What would you do if you were arrested for sharing your faith in public?  Would you hire an attorney to defend you and negotiate a plea bargain with the District Attorney for a minor infraction? Our clients could have accepted a deal for an infraction, which would have included nothing more than a small fine. Instead, however, our clients stood upon the First Amendment in the face of misdemeanor charges that could have led to a $500 fine and 90 days in jail.

Present-day faith like Paul

This situation has interesting similarities to the biblical events recorded in Acts 16. Paul and Silas had been preaching in Greece and bringing the Good News of salvation. The authorities violated their rights as Roman citizens by ordering them to be beaten and thrown into prison after a crowd rose up against them for preaching the gospel and throwing the city into confusion.

Around midnight, as Paul and Silas were praying and singing hymns, an earthquake shook the prison doors open and released their chains. Although they were given the opportunity to run from their trouble, Paul and Silas stood firm in their faith. In fact, when the authorities learned that Paul and Silas were Roman citizens, the authorities begged them to leave quietly. Paul would not have this; he knew that his liberties had been violated as a Roman citizen and he demanded that they be escorted out of prison by the authorities. Paul told the officers, “They have publicly beaten us without a trial and put us in prison­­–and we are Roman citizens. So now they want us to leave secretly? Certainly not!” (Acts 16:37)

Our clients were given the chance to plead guilty to an infraction and end the whole matter, with no jail time. But they, and we, believe that they did nothing wrong–they were exercising their First Amendment freedom of speech in order to spread the Gospel, and they knew that they could not let this injustice go away quietly.

We were honored to be aided in this fight by our co-counsel Nic Cocis, a devoted Christian lawyer who grew up in the Communist era in Romania. He understands how blessed we are here in America, and how vital it is that we always take a stand to preserve our liberties!

            We can now move forward with our federal case for unlawful arrest. Our case will proceed against the CHP in the United States District Court for the purpose of deterring authorities from illegally arresting individuals for the peaceful expression of faith.

         If you believe that everyone should have the right to spread the Word of God without the threat of arrest, please consider a financial gift to help us with this federal case. Any amount you contribute will help to fund the manpower, hours of legal and strategy preparation, filing fees, and travel costs to make sure we are properly equipped for what is to come.

            From the bottom of our hearts, we thank you for your continued support and the blessing that you are to our ministry!

God bless you,

Robert Tyler

General Counsel

**************************

 

Late Tuesday, Superior Court Judge Timothy Freer found two men “not guilty” after they were charged and tried for reading the Bible aloud in front of a line of people waiting to enter the DMV in Hemet, California. One of them is Pastor Brett Coronado of Reconciled Christian Fellowship in Hemet, California and the other is an elder of the church.Video of Christians Arrested

View the video of the arrest. This story was widely covered by Fox News and many other news outlets shortly after the arrests: Fox News Video.

You can view our previous press release that outlines the facts and charges.

The prosecution needed to prove that the men were required to obtain a permit before engaging in their expressive activity of reading the Bible. After the prosecution rested, the defense team made a motion for directed verdict and Judge Freer entered a verdict of “not guilty” before the defense was required to present its own witnesses and evidence.

Robert Tyler, one of the defense attorneys and General Counsel for Advocates for Faith & Freedom stated, “The prosecution failed to meet its burden of proof that our clients committed a crime when they read the Bible aloud in front of a line of people.”

Nic Cocis, defense attorney and co-counsel, remarked, “These men were exercising their First Amendment right of Free Speech. They were simply sharing their faith on public property and the criminal charges should never have been filed.”

In order for the prosecution to prove that a permit was required under Title 13, Section 1860 of the California Administrative Code, it was required to prove that the defendants were engaged in a “demonstration or gathering” as defined in Section 1851. Judge Freer ruled that there was insufficient evidence to prove that the men conducted either a “demonstration or gathering.” Both definitions require that the conduct of defendants was such that it had “the effect, intent or propensity to draw a crowd or onlookers” and the prosecution couldn’t prove that to be the case.

Robert Tyler stated, “We were very pleased because Judge Freer also agreed that the law was unconstitutional because it gives too much unfettered discretion to law enforcement in determining whether someone’s speech or other expressive activity has the effect, intent or propensity to draw a crowd or onlookers.” He further stated, “Although Judge Freer’s final verdict did not include a finding on constitutionality, his comments certainly vindicate our argument that the law is unconstitutional.”

We had previously filed a federal lawsuit for unlawful arrest before these criminal charges were filed against the men. That lawsuit was stayed pending the outcome of this criminal case. The federal case will now proceed against the California Highway Patrol before the Honorable Dolly Gee in the United States District Court, Central District of California, which is located in Los Angeles.  A copy of the federal complaint can be found [here].

Attorney Nic Cocis emigrated from Romania at the age of 13 when the country was still being controlled by a communist regime. He remarked, “This case has particular importance to me because my family was persecuted for our Christian faith in communist Romania, and I will fight to protect the freedom of speech and to ensure that the same persecution doesn’t occur in the United States.”

Articles covering this story: LA TimesPress Enterprise

Happy 4th from Advocates!

Dear friends,Fourth_of_July_and_Statue_of_Liberty

All of us here at Advocates for Faith & Freedom wish you a Happy 4th of July!  Today, we celebrate the freedoms and liberties that we are blessed with due to God’s grace and the courage and faith of our forefathers. 

As Thomas Jefferson said:

“God who gave us life gave us liberty. Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that his justice cannot sleep forever. Commerce between master and slave is despotism. Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free.”

May you enjoy this day with your family and friends, and praise God for this nation and our freedom!

Blessings,
The Advocates Team

Planned Parenthood is at it Again

         Planned Parenthood has sponsored and is a key advocate of AB 154 in California – a bill that would dramatically increase the number of abortions in this state. According to Planned Parenthood, the bill would “address the current shortage of health care professionals able to provide early abortion care in California” and reduce long wait times.  If passed, the bill would allow nurse practitioners, physicians’ assistants, and certified midwives to perform first trimester abortions by means of aspiration (suctioning out the contents of the uterus) or medication (drugs that end a pregnancy). Baby_hand_and_adult Not only is this an affront to the value of life, but this could also be a potential safety issue for pregnant mothers.   Allowing non-physicians to administer these procedures could possibly result in a higher risk of complications.

We strongly oppose a bill that widens the availability of abortion and further demeans the value of unborn life.  This bill has already passed through two committees in the California legislature…please join us in prayer as it moves to the Assembly Appropriations Committee!

ACTION ALERT

Please contact the members on the California Assembly Appropriations Committee and tell them you strongly oppose AB 154!  Find their contact information here: http://apro.assembly.ca.gov/membersstaff

Why Are "Adult Businesses" Protected More Than Churches?

Local zoning laws are required by law to permit “adult businesses” without the same burdens hurled upon churches. The U.S. Supreme Court has determined that “adult businesses” are entitled to protection from discriminatory zoning laws because the businesses’ “speech” and “expression” are protected by the First Amendment. And why aren't churches and Christian schools entitled to the same protection as “adult businesses”? It's because of the fact no legal precedent has yet been established on behalf of the churches.

We have a plan to correct this injustice in the courts, but we need your help!

Please be on the lookout for churches that are going through the permitting process to occupy a building, expand their facilities or build a new building. Refer them to Advocates for Faith and Freedom because we can probably help.

We have also found that many zoning regulations applied to churches are unconstitutionally applied or violate the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. Regulations are often unlawful because they impose substantial burdens on churches that are not justified or they impose burdens on churches that are not equally imposed upon other similar uses like movie theaters and assembly halls. Sometimes, churches are unlawfully excluded from zoning districts while other similar uses are permitted.

Please let your church leaders know that we are here to help them. We are searching for the right cases with the right set of facts in order to establish the legal precedent that is long overdue.

 

Victory in San Diego!

Last week, we received an urgent call from one of our ministry friends, Ron Harper. He asked for our immediate help to prevent the County of San Diego from placing a huge burden on churches.church_parking_lot Ron is a contractor who specializes in building churches. Ron informed us that the County of San Diego was planning to adopt a new law that would require all churches to drastically increase the amount of parking they provide before they expand any facilities or build a new building.

Ron said that the new law would require churches to purchase twice the amount of land currently required. Further, a church would be required to buy almost twice the amount of land that a similarly sized movie theater, convention center or other assembly-type use would be required to buy even though the parking needs are the same.

In most cases, the cost of having church in the County of San Diego would be so great that churches would be priced out of existence.

We intervened and wrote an extensive legal opinion to the County of San Diego on behalf of numerous churches, including Maranatha Christian Fellowship and Horizon Christian Fellowship, explaining why the new law violated federal law. Along with Ron, we were able to build a grassroots effort in about 12 hours that included an e-mail blast from a San Diego state assemblyman and support from San Diego churches representing tens of thousands of residents.

The Board of Supervisors unanimously voted down the new law and in favor of churches. The Supervisors mentioned that this had become “a huge controversy, suddenly-out of the blue.” Ron Harper commented, “It was great to watch a victory come together ‘out of the blue’ in such a short time!”

Thank you for supporting our ministry so that we can quickly come to the aid of worthy causes like this one!  Although this case will never hit national news, the victory will help save millions upon millions of dollars for San Diego churches.

Preliminary Victory for Calvary Chapel Bible Fellowship

Calvary_Chapel_Bible_FellowshipShortly after Calvary Chapel Bible Fellowship (affectionately known as "The Barn”) was built in 1999, the County of Riverside, CA, covertly passed a ban on further expansion or establishment of churches in the Temecula Wine Country. After The Barn decided last year to expand its church facilities and build a small private country school for grades K-8, they learned of the County’s ban on churches. We have advised the County that the ban violates federal law and is unconstitutional.

Last week, we won a preliminary victory, as the Board of Supervisors in Riverside County, California, voted unanimously to begin considering an amendment to the existing zoning regulations that would allow churches and other religious organizations to move into the Temecula Wine Country! This does not assure churches the right to move into Wine Country just yet, but it does show a positive sign that the Board will begin working with us to correct the unlawful ordinances.