ADVOCATES FOR FAITH & FREEDOM
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: WEDNESDAY, MAY 6 2026
CONTACT: NICOLE VELASCO AT
MEDIA@FAITH-FREEDOM.COM
Murrieta, California — Advocates for Faith & Freedom, together with California Justice Center, has filed a motion on behalf of the Chino Valley Unified School District to dissolve a court injunction that blocked its parental notification policy.
The motion follows a landmark ruling by the United States Supreme Court in Mirabelli v. Bonta, which held that policies preventing parental notification regarding a child’s gender identity or social transition likely violate the Constitution.
In light of this decision, the District is asking the court to dissolve the October 3, 2024 permanent injunction that prohibited enforcement of its parental notification policy.
“This is a defining moment for parental rights in America,” said Robert Tyler, President and Chief Counsel of Advocates for Faith & Freedom. “The Supreme Court has made clear that parents are not to be sidelined in the most important decisions affecting their children. Government policies that hide critical information from parents are not only wrong, they are unconstitutional. Courts must now bring their rulings into alignment with that truth.”
“Chino Valley is now in the impossible position of being subject to two conflicting permanent injunctions—one from the Mirabelli case requiring Chino to notify parents if their child asks to change their gender and the other from AG Bonta’s 2023 case against Chino that prohibits Chino’s parental notification policy,” said Emily Rae, President of California Justice Center. “We filed this suit with Advocates for Faith & Freedom to ensure that Chino has clarity moving forward and to stand up for the rights of Chino Valley parents.”
The District’s policy, adopted in July 2023, required schools to notify parents when a student requested to be treated as a gender different from their biological sex, including changes to name, pronouns, or access to facilities.
That policy was enjoined following litigation brought by the State of California. However, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Mirabelli represents a material change in controlling law, directly undermining the legal foundation of the injunction.
The motion argues that continued enforcement of the injunction would place the District in direct conflict with federal constitutional protections and require conduct that infringes on the rights of parents.
A hearing is scheduled for August 19, 2026, in the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino.
###
